ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred large-scale, inter-institutional research efforts. To enable these efforts, researchers must agree on dataset definitions that not only cover all elements relevant to the respective medical specialty but that are also syntactically and semantically interoperable. Following such an effort, the German Corona Consensus (GECCO) dataset has been developed previously as a harmonized, interoperable collection of the most relevant data elements for COVID-19-related patient research. As GECCO has been developed as a compact core dataset across all medical fields, the focused research within particular medical domains demands the definition of extension modules that include those data elements that are most relevant to the research performed in these individual medical specialties. OBJECTIVE: To (i) specify a workflow for the development of interoperable dataset definitions that involves a close collaboration between medical experts and information scientists and to (ii) apply the workflow to develop dataset definitions that include data elements most relevant to COVID-19-related patient research regarding immunization, pediatrics, and cardiology. METHODS: We developed a workflow to create dataset definitions that are (i) content-wise as relevant as possible to a specific field of study and (ii) universally usable across computer systems, institutions, and countries, i.e., interoperable. We then gathered medical experts from three specialties (infectious diseases with a focus on immunization, pediatrics, and cardiology) to the select data elements most relevant to COVID-19-related patient research in the respective specialty. We mapped the data elements to international standardized vocabularies and created data exchange specifications using HL7 FHIR. All steps were performed in close interdisciplinary collaboration between medical domain experts and medical information specialists. The profiles and vocabulary mappings were syntactically and semantically validated in a two-stage process. RESULTS: We created GECCO extension modules for the immunization, pediatrics, and cardiology domains with respect to the pandemic requests. The data elements included in each of these modules were selected according to the here developed consensus-based workflow by medical experts from the respective specialty to ensure that the contents are aligned with the respective research needs. We defined dataset specifications for a total number of 48 (immunization), 150 (pediatrics), and 52 (cardiology) data elements that complement the GECCO core dataset. We created and published implementation guides and example implementations as well as dataset annotations for each extension module. CONCLUSIONS: These here presented GECCO extension modules, which contain data elements most relevant to COVID-19-related patient research in infectious diseases with a focus on immunization, pediatrics and cardiology, were defined in an interdisciplinary, iterative, consensus-based workflow that may serve as a blueprint for the development of further dataset definitions. The GECCO extension modules provide a standardized and harmonized definition of specialty-related datasets that can help to enable inter-institutional and cross-country COVID-19 research in these specialties.
ABSTRACT
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has underscored the importance of real world data in everyday clinical practice and has highlighted some long-standing problems of our healthcare system such as gaps in primary data collection, hurdles in the evaluation of patient data, and complexity regarding the data exchange between different institutions. In addition, changes in physician-patient relationships such as transitions from a paternalistic to a partnership-based relationship model as well as increasing digitalization have shaped our modern understanding of healthcare, emphasizing the issue of patient autonomy and self-efficacy and highlighting the need for innovative, patient-centered approaches. Methods Using the patient journey as a theoretical construct, we describe the collection of different types of real world data, their meaning and handling. Conclusion Mapping the patient journey process combined with a widely used data standard can lead to the acquisition of primary data in the healthcare sector which can be used by all medical treatment institutions. This will lead to an exchange of valuable data between institutions and circuit the current problem of proprietary formats. Furthermore, the evaluation of patient-reported outcomes as a standard in the clinical routine could enhance patients' autonomy and optimize treatment. Thus, the overall treatment effectiveness and survival of patients can be improved by creating a common data language and using a holistic, human-centered care approach through integrating perspectives of patients and their loved ones.
ABSTRACT
Hintergrund Die COVID-19-Pandemie („coronavirus disease 2019“) hat die Bedeutung von Real World Data (RWD) im klinischen Alltag unterstrichen und die fatalen Folgen von längst existierenden Problemen wie Lücken in der Primärdatenerfassung, Hürden bei der Auswertung von Patientendaten sowie erschwertem Patientendatenaustausch zwischen verschiedenen Einrichtungen nochmal deutlich gemacht. Darüber hinaus haben Entwicklungen weg von einem paternalistischen hin zu einem partnerschaftlichen Modell der Arzt-Patienten-Beziehung sowie die zunehmende Digitalisierung unser Verständnis von Gesundheitsversorgung geprägt, das Thema der Patientenautonomie und Selbstwirksamkeit in den Vordergrund gebracht und den Bedarf an innovativen, patientenzentrierten Lösungsansätzen verdeutlicht. Methoden Wir nutzen die „patient journey“ als theoretisches Konstrukt, entlang dessen wir die Sammlung von verschiedenen Typen von RWD, ihre Bedeutung und Umgang damit beschreiben. Schlussfolgerung Die Abbildung der „patient journey“ in Verbindung mit der Nutzung eines einheitlichen Datenstandards kann zur Erfassung von Primärdaten im Gesundheitswesen führen, die von allen medizinischen Behandlungseinrichtungen genutzt werden können. Dies wird den Austausch von Daten zwischen Einrichtungen erleichtern. Darüber hinaus könnte die fortlaufende Auswertung von patientenberichteten Ereignissen als Standard in der klinischen Routine die Patientenautonomie stärken und die Behandlung optimieren. Zusammenfassend lässt sich sagen, dass der Behandlungserfolg, das Gesamtüberleben und das Wohlbefinden der Patienten durch die Schaffung einer gemeinsamen Datensprache und eines ganzheitlichen, menschenzentrierten Ansatzes verbessert werden können.
ABSTRACT
The German government initiated the Network University Medicine (NUM) in early 2020 to improve national research activities on the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. To this end, 36 German Academic Medical Centers started to collaborate on 13 projects, with the largest being the National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON). The NAPKON's goal is creating the most comprehensive Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cohort in Germany. Within NAPKON, adult and pediatric patients are observed in three complementary cohort platforms (Cross-Sectoral, High-Resolution and Population-Based) from the initial infection until up to three years of follow-up. Study procedures comprise comprehensive clinical and imaging diagnostics, quality-of-life assessment, patient-reported outcomes and biosampling. The three cohort platforms build on four infrastructure core units (Interaction, Biosampling, Epidemiology, and Integration) and collaborations with NUM projects. Key components of the data capture, regulatory, and data privacy are based on the German Centre for Cardiovascular Research. By April 01, 2022, 34 university and 40 non-university hospitals have enrolled 5298 patients with local data quality reviews performed on 4727 (89%). 47% were female, the median age was 52 (IQR 36-62-) and 50 pediatric cases were included. 44% of patients were hospitalized, 15% admitted to an intensive care unit, and 12% of patients deceased while enrolled. 8845 visits with biosampling in 4349 patients were conducted by April 03, 2022. In this overview article, we summarize NAPKON's design, relevant milestones including first study population characteristics, and outline the potential of NAPKON for German and international research activities.Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04768998 . https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04747366 . https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04679584.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Research Design , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Background: The current COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge of research activity. While this research provides important insights, the multitude of studies results in an increasing fragmentation of information. To ensure comparability across projects and institutions, standard datasets are needed. Here, we introduce the “German Corona Consensus Dataset” (GECCO), a uniform dataset that uses international terminologies and health IT standards to improve interoperability of COVID-19 data, in particular for university medicine. Methods: Based on previous work (e.g., the ISARIC-WHO COVID-19 case report form) and in coordination with experts from university hospitals, professional associations and research initiatives, data elements relevant for COVID-19 research were collected, prioritized and consolidated into a compact core dataset. The dataset was mapped to international terminologies, and the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard was used to define interoperable, machine-readable data formats. Results: A core dataset consisting of 81 data elements with 281 response options was defined, including information about, for example, demography, medical history, symptoms, therapy, medications or laboratory values of COVID-19 patients. Data elements and response options were mapped to SNOMED CT, LOINC, UCUM, ICD-10-GM and ATC, and FHIR profiles for interoperable data exchange were defined. Conclusion: GECCO provides a compact, interoperable dataset that can help to make COVID-19 research data more comparable across studies and institutions. The dataset will be further refined in the future by adding domain-specific extension modules for more specialized use cases.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The current COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge of research activity. While this research provides important insights, the multitude of studies results in an increasing fragmentation of information. To ensure comparability across projects and institutions, standard datasets are needed. Here, we introduce the "German Corona Consensus Dataset" (GECCO), a uniform dataset that uses international terminologies and health IT standards to improve interoperability of COVID-19 data, in particular for university medicine. METHODS: Based on previous work (e.g., the ISARIC-WHO COVID-19 case report form) and in coordination with experts from university hospitals, professional associations and research initiatives, data elements relevant for COVID-19 research were collected, prioritized and consolidated into a compact core dataset. The dataset was mapped to international terminologies, and the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard was used to define interoperable, machine-readable data formats. RESULTS: A core dataset consisting of 81 data elements with 281 response options was defined, including information about, for example, demography, medical history, symptoms, therapy, medications or laboratory values of COVID-19 patients. Data elements and response options were mapped to SNOMED CT, LOINC, UCUM, ICD-10-GM and ATC, and FHIR profiles for interoperable data exchange were defined. CONCLUSION: GECCO provides a compact, interoperable dataset that can help to make COVID-19 research data more comparable across studies and institutions. The dataset will be further refined in the future by adding domain-specific extension modules for more specialized use cases.